In this article, we’ll walk you through the key factors to consider when selecting materials for machining, including strength, hardness, machinability, and the material’s end-use application.
Before diving into the specifics of materials, it's important to have a clear understanding of the project’s requirements.
Once the functional requirements are clear, consider the specific material properties that align with those needs. The most important properties to consider include:
Strength: The material must be strong enough to handle the expected mechanical stresses, such as tensile strength (resistance to pulling forces) and yield strength (resistance to deformation). High-strength alloys such as titaniumor tool steel may be required for demanding applications in aerospace or automotive industries, while aluminumand mild steel may suffice for general-purpose applications.
Hardness: If the part is subjected to wear, abrasion, or friction, you’ll need a material with sufficient hardness. For example, tool steel and carbide are often chosen for their hardness in cutting tools or wear-resistant parts.
Corrosion Resistance: For parts exposed to moisture, chemicals, or extreme environments, corrosion-resistant materials like stainless steel, titanium, or aluminum alloys are preferable.
Machinability: How easy is the material to cut and shape? Aluminum, brass, and mild steel are relatively easy to machine, whereas materials like titanium, stainless steel, or tool steel can be more challenging and may require specialized tooling or slower cutting speeds. Machining difficulty can directly impact production time and cost.
Thermal Stability: If the part needs to withstand high temperatures, materials such as high-temperature alloys, stainless steel, and titanium may be necessary. For applications requiring thermal conductivity (like heat exchangers), materials like copper or aluminum are more suitable.
Material costs can vary dramatically, and choosing an inappropriate material can drive up both direct and indirect costs. Cost-effective material selection involves balancing material performance with the overall manufacturing costs. Here are some considerations:
Material Cost: Base material costs are typically one of the largest factors influencing the final price of a part. For example, aluminum is generally cheaper than titanium or stainless steel, so it makes sense to use aluminum for non-critical components. However, sometimes, the lower cost of a cheaper material can be offset by the increased time and tooling required for machining.
Machining Costs: Some materials, though less expensive upfront, are harder to machine, requiring specialized equipment, longer machining times, and more tool wear. For example, titanium is a stronger material but is difficult to machine, so it may drive up production costs. On the other hand, aluminum is easier to machine and may result in lower production costs despite a higher initial material cost.
Availability: Some high-performance materials may have long lead times or be harder to source, which could delay production. Make sure the material you select is readily available in the quantities and grades required for your project.
The precision and finish of the final part will affect the material selection. If the part requires very tight tolerances or a high-quality surface finish, the material must be compatible with the required machining process.
In addition to performance and cost, consider the environmental impact and sustainability of the material chosen. This includes its sourcing, recyclability, and any potential environmental impacts during production or use. Materials like recycled aluminum and steel are more sustainable than newer metals like titanium or rare earth elements, which are more energy-intensive to extract and process.
After narrowing down your material options, it’s wise to prototype and test the material to ensure it meets both performance and cost expectations. Testing allows you to assess how the material behaves during machining and whether it performs well in real-world conditions. Additionally, prototyping can highlight potential issues with material choice, such as unexpected tool wear, difficulty with machining, or poor mechanical properties in certain environments.
How Choosing the Wrong Material Can Lead to Higher Production Costs in Machining
Let’s go through a structured approach to investigate how machining costs are generated and identify potential areas where costs could be optimized to meet the customer’s budget.
One of the critical cost considerations in machining is machining speed — how quickly a part can be produced, which directly impacts both labor costs and equipment wear and tear. If the wrong material is selected, it can result in slower machining times, higher tool wear, and increased energy consumption, all of which lead to higher production costs. Therefore, material selection is not just about performance but also about ensuring that the material is machinable in a way that aligns with the production schedule and budget.
Machinability refers to how easily a material can be cut, shaped, or finished during the machining process. Materials with poor machinability require slower cutting speeds, more frequent tool changes, and often higher cutting forces, all of which increase production time and cost.
If you're machining a part out of titanium when a less expensive material like aluminum would suffice, the titanium will likely require slower feed rates, reduced cutting speeds, and higher levels of cutting force, which will result in longer machining times, higher tool wear, and ultimately, higher costs.
2. Cutting Speed and Feed Rate ImpactThe cutting speed (the speed at which the tool moves through the material) and feed rate (the rate at which the tool advances during cutting) are directly related to machining time. Choosing a material that is too hard or tough for the intended machining process may require significantly slower cutting speeds and lower feed rates to avoid tool damage or poor surface finishes.
Machining steel with high carbon content can be challenging, as it may require slower speeds to prevent excessive heat buildup, which in turn increases cycle time. A material with better machinability, like aluminum or mild steel, would allow for faster processing, reducing production time and cutting costs.
Materials that are hard or abrasive tend to increase the cost of tooling. For example, when machining materials like stainless steel, titanium, or high-hardness alloys, specialized cutting tools made from materials like carbide or cermetmay be required, which are more expensive than standard high-speed steel tools.
Additionally, tool wear is accelerated when machining tougher materials. The more a tool wears down, the more often it needs to be replaced or sharpened, which adds to the total cost of the machining process.
Machining titanium with a carbide tool could require frequent changes, whereas aluminum might allow the use of less expensive and less durable tools that last longer, thus reducing the overall tooling cost.
The machining process requires energy to power cutting tools, machines, and other equipment. When machining tougher materials, the power needed for cutting increases due to the higher cutting forces involved. This results in higher energy consumption, which contributes to overall production costs.
Machining aluminum might use 40% less power than machining stainless steel due to the reduced cutting forces and lower temperatures generated during machining, leading to lower electricity costs.
The surface finish required for a part can also influence machining time. If a part made from a difficult-to-machine material requires a very fine surface finish, additional finishing processes may be needed, such as grinding, polishing, or coating. These additional processes can increase both machining time and cost.
If a part made from stainless steel requires a high-quality finish and additional grinding or polishing steps, it could add hours or even days to the production timeline. On the other hand, an aluminum part may already meet surface finish specifications after the initial machining process, saving both time and money.
The material's hardness and toughness also affect the tool path and machining strategy used. More complex tool paths, such as those required for harder materials, can lengthen machining times and complicate the process.
For example, machining titanium might involve more complicated tool paths, multiple passes, and slower feed rates to prevent excessive heat buildup and tool wear. In contrast, aluminum might allow for a more straightforward machining process with higher material removal rates.
Machining a part out of high-strength steel may require several passes at low cutting depths to avoid tool deflection and overheating, which increases cycle time. If aluminum were chosen instead, a deeper cut with higher material removal rates might be possible, reducing overall machining time.
Conclusion:
To optimize both production speed and cost-effectiveness, it's essential to select materials that strike the right balance between performance requirements and machinability, while also being cost-efficient and readily available. By considering these factors, both parties can benefit: the supplier can achieve more efficient costing, potentially aligning with the customer’s budget, while the customer can enjoy lower production costs, ultimately leading to greater profitability for their project.
Singapore
